Thmyl: Lbt Jyms Bwnd Llandrwyd Mn Mydya Fayr

thmyl → guzly — no.

But apply ROT13 to all:

lbt = l b t → ‘l b t’ — maybe ‘lab t’? ‘lob t’? Or ‘let’? l e t → l y t? No, l b t → if b=e, then let? No, b would be e? Unlikely. thmyl lbt jyms bwnd llandrwyd mn mydya fayr

lbt — ‘lbt’ = ‘lob it’? unlikely. jyms — ‘jyms’ = ‘gyms’? (j=g?). bwnd — ‘bwnd’ = ‘beyond’? (bwnd → b w n d, add e o? ‘beyond’ has 6 letters). Actually, let’s test Caesar cipher with shift of +1 (a→b) but backwards? No, systematic: thmyl → guzly — no

The whole string could be an or transposition cipher . 10. Hypothesis: Each word’s letters have been sorted alphabetically or scrambled Check: thmyl sorted = hlmty — not helpful. lbt sorted = blt . jyms sorted = jmsy . bwnd sorted = bdnw . llandrwyd sorted = addllnrwwy . mn sorted = mn . mydya sorted = admyy . fayr sorted = afry . Or ‘let’

thmyl → lymht (no) lbt → tbl jyms → smyj bwnd → dnwb llandrwyd → dywrdnall mn → nm mydya → aydym fayr → ryaf

Still nonsense. But note llandrwyd — Welsh has ll as a single phoneme, dd as voiced ‘th’, wy as ‘oo-ee’ sound. This suggests the plaintext might be Welsh or pseudo-Welsh .