TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History
  • TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History

Ttc - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History May 2026

The post-Civil War era, in Allitt’s framework, sees the rise of a new challenge: . The Scopes Trial of 1925 is a set piece here, representing the clash between agrarian fundamentalism and cosmopolitan modernism. But Allitt resists the urge to paint this as a war between science and religion. Instead, he shows it as a war within religion. Modernists like Harry Emerson Fosdick sought to reconcile faith with Darwin and higher biblical criticism, arguing that Christianity was about ethics and social progress. Fundamentalists retrenched, creating a parallel culture of Bible colleges and radio ministries. This schism created the political geography we recognize today—the "Bible Belt" versus the "unchurched" coasts.

Perhaps the most profound contribution of Allitt’s course is his treatment of as a theological engine. Unlike a typical survey that treats Catholicism and Judaism as footnotes to Protestantism, Allitt integrates them as essential drivers of change. The massive immigration of Irish, Italian, and Polish Catholics in the 19th century provoked a nativist panic (the Know-Nothings, the Klan) that forced Protestants to define what "American" meant. Was it a Protestant nation, or a Judeo-Christian one? Similarly, the post-WWII era saw the rise of the "triple melting pot"—Protestant, Catholic, Jew—where leaders like Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel and Cardinal Francis Spellman fought for civil rights and the suburbanization of the American Dream. TTC - Prof. Patrick N Allitt - American Religious History

Finally, Allitt brings us to the late 20th century, where the narrative arcs toward the current "nones"—the 30% of Americans who claim no religious affiliation. He posits that this is not necessarily a decline in spirituality but a rejection of institutional authority. The heirs of the Puritans are not necessarily the Presbyterians, but the self-help gurus and the New Age movement. The Moral Majority of Jerry Falwell, the course suggests, was a last gasp of Christendom, a political mobilization that succeeded in the short term but may have accelerated secularization by yoking the gospel so tightly to partisanship. The post-Civil War era, in Allitt’s framework, sees

In conclusion, Professor Patrick N. Allitt’s American Religious History is more than a chronology of denominations; it is a masterclass in how ideas become culture. The essayist must walk away with a singular realization: to be an American is to be a heretic. Whether one is a Puritan breaking from Canterbury, a Mormon breaking from Protestantism, a Black theologian breaking from white supremacy, or an atheist breaking from theism, the American pattern is dissent. Allitt shows us that the "city on a hill" is not a static monument but a construction site—perpetually burning, being rebuilt, and set alight again by the restless, holy fire of the human spirit. The history of the republic is, in its most profound sense, a religious history; and as long as Americans argue about grace, justice, and truth, that history will never end. Instead, he shows it as a war within religion

Back to top